Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02225
Original file (BC 2013 02225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02225
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of 
Educational Benefits (TEB) to her dependents.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was informed that she had up to ten years after retirement 
to transfer her benefits to her dependents.

The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of 
her appeal.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Reserve Order EK 0436 dated 20 October 2005, states the 
applicant transferred to the Retired Reserves effective 14 
November 2005 in the grade of technical sergeant.

Any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009, who, 
at the time of the approval of the individual's request to 
transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this 
section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 
6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or 
Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve a 
specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of 
election.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial.  DPTT states the mechanism for 
transferring benefits was available on 29 June 2009 but, by law, 
the applicant was required to be active duty or selected reserve 
on 1 August 2009 as well as on the date the request to transfer 
was initiated.

Each year, Congress reconsiders allowing the transfer 
opportunity for members who retired before the inception of the 
program.  To date Congress has declined to make that change.  
There is no opportunity to transfer if the member retired prior 
to 1 August 2009.

To be eligible for benefits, a member must have a minimum 90 
days of qualifying active duty defined in DTM 09-003 for members 
of the Reserve Components of the Armed Forces as “service on 
active duty under a call or order to active duty under section 
688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(G), 12302, or 12304 of Title 10 
USC.”  The applicant had seven days of qualifying active duty.

Based on the facts provided, the applicant is not eligible to 
transfer her benefits to her dependents.  Nor does the applicant 
have benefits to use herself.

The DPTT complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 21 June 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02225 in Executive Session on 27 March 2014, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 May 2013.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Records.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 11 June 2013, w/atchs.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 June 2013.




2


3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03120

    Original file (BC 2013 03120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The mechanism for transferring Post- 9/11 GI Bill benefits has been available since 29 June 2009 but, by law, the member is required to be active duty or selected reserve on the date the request to transfer is initiated. Based on the facts provided, the applicant is not eligible to transfer his benefits to his dependents as defined in Public Law No. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02209

    Original file (BC 2014 02209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because his daughter was still in middle school at the time he retired. Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any Service member on or after 1 August 2009, who is entitled to the Post-9/11 GI Bill at the time of the approval of his or her request to transfer that entitlement, may transfer that entitlement provided he or she meets one of these conditions: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02064

    Original file (BC 2014 02064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2306, “For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 Aug 09, no additional service is required.” Given that the applicant was eligible for retirement prior to 1 Aug 09, he would have incurred no active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation with TEB approval. Based on the applicant’s retirement date, he retired prior to the TEB program being established and therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02018

    Original file (BC-2012-02018.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the Board determines otherwise, he is able to provide whatever evidence is deemed necessary. The applicant did not provide any documents in support of his request. In this respect, the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) has indicated that through no fault of the applicant it appears he may not have been afforded the opportunity to transfer his benefits to his dependents.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00386

    Original file (BC-2013-00386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouse or children. A complete copy of the DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05250

    Original file (BC 2013 05250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). The applicant refers...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00869

    Original file (BC 2014 00869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00869 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependent. DPTT states the applicant transferred all 36 months of his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his daughter prior to his retirement on 28 August 2010. The DPTT complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00764

    Original file (BC 2014 00764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00764 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 19 Dec 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02277

    Original file (BC-2012-02277.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05517

    Original file (BC 2013 05517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant retired prior to the implementation of the program (1 August 2009) and therefore was never eligible to transfer benefits. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated...